"When I give, I give myself." -- Walt Whitman
Posted on Monday, July 17, 2006 9:10 PM

Like most CAD programs, Google SketchUp has a programming language, allowing users to add new features and other customizations. SketchUp's language is Ruby, a new general-purpose language noted for ease of learning and use. In the SketchUp User Forum, a Ruby programmer is wondering if there is interest from SketchUp users in a connection between SketchUp and Google Spreadsheets, a web-based spreadsheet Google introduced recently. The programmer writes:

While doing some testing I stumbled across a way to create an interoperability with the new Google Spreadsheets with identity attachments to SketchUp CAD drafting. This could also possible allow an integrated Bill Of Materials (BOM) working in collaboration with a drawing using these two products. Question: could this be of any one's use or consideration for a Bill Of Material  (BOM) feature add-on to SketchUp? I only want to continue this proposition for a new add-on if there's enough interest. 

If you want to encourage this programmer, you should visit the forum and add a reply to his post. Registration is required to add comments.

  --RSN

Feedback

# re: Does Anybody Want to Connect Google Spreadsheets to SketchUp?

7/18/2006 10:06 AM by ralphg
I find it fascinating that I can understand these CAD-related Google hookups -- unlike the ones that CAD vendors are making with Microsoft.

Here's my point: I bet most CAD users can understand the concept of linking a Google spreadsheet to a Google CAD product; how many can understand what Dassault is doing (er, not doing, announcing) with Microsoft?

# re: Does Anybody Want to Connect Google Spreadsheets to SketchUp?

7/19/2006 8:59 AM by Randall Newton
Ralph, I don't normally enter the comments area, since I own the main stage on this website. But I have to say, I read your note and chuckled warmly. You are spot on in your observation. There is a defense to be made for many of the large technology partnerships you allude to, but the kind of move here reminds me of the days when PC-based CAD was doing an end-run around minicomputer-based systems.
Comments on this post are closed