"Invest in inflation; it is the only thing that is going up." -- Will Rogers
Posted on Monday, September 08, 2008 3:02 PM
I'm doing a little research before flying to Baltimore later this week for a press event with Nemetschek North America (NNA), developers of the VectorWorks product line. And I've decided it is quite likely the big news to come will be more than just a new version of VectorWorks, but that NNA has decided to switch its 3D modeling kernel from Solids++ to Siemens PLM's Parasolid.

The signs are subtle, but I've seen these kinds of things before. For a few minutes last week, the web-based agenda for the press event listed two Siemens PLM employees, whom I know represent Parasolid. Somebody at NNA must have realized they let something slip, because that information is no longer listed. Also, Siemens PLM in June released a version of Parasolid for the 64-bit Mac "Leopard" environment, a must-have for NNA, which sells VectorWorks in both Windows and Macintosh versions. A 64-bit Parasolid-based version of VectorWorks Architect on the Mac would arguably be the most powerful BIM creation tool on the market. I have other reasons to think this is happening, but I need to keep those sources of information close to the chest.

3D CAD modelers in AEC are anemic compared to their MCAD-specific cousins such as the mid-range SolidWorks and Autodesk Inventor, or the high-end NX or CATIA. The world's largest architecture firms are always looking at MCAD products, seeking a competitive edge. Quite a few architects use Rhino on a regular basis, and a few firms have incorporated the AEC version of CATIA, Digital Project from Gehry Technologies. A Parasolid-powered VectorWorks would raise the stakes in the BIM marketing wars, something Nemetschek North America is obviously doing by holding their first-ever press event and paying for a variety of writers (including myself) to come to Baltimore for meetings. Right now among AEC-specific 3D CAD tools, only Bentley's MicroStation uses Parasolid as its 3D kernel.

The meetings are Thursday; I'll let you know then if I'm right.

  --RSN

Feedback

# re: Could VectorWorks Be Switching to Parasolid?

9/8/2008 3:53 PM by ralphg
... or Friday.

# re: Could VectorWorks Be Switching to Parasolid?

9/9/2008 4:35 PM by Nolton Johnson
Randall,

I have really done well with SolidWorks in the machine design field since 2001. Prior to that I used VectorWorks on a Mac. My problem is the PC, it trips me up all the time and I am sick of it!

If VectorWorks does this and becomes anything close to SolidWorks in funcionality I will dump the PC and SolidWorks since they refuse to port to the Mac.

Nolton

# re: Could VectorWorks Be Switching to Parasolid?

9/10/2008 12:38 AM by Christiaan
So what's the big advantage of Parasolids?

# re: Could VectorWorks Be Switching to Parasolid?

9/10/2008 1:12 AM by Stefan Wingquist
Nemetschek would not go to all the effort of switching to Parasolid if there was not a significant advantage. Parasolid is used by virtually everyone in the MCAD world. It makes sharing models and sub-contracting so much easier if evryone uses the same modeler. It has to be a good selling point to have the best engine in your product.

# re: Could VectorWorks Be Switching to Parasolid?

9/10/2008 6:21 PM by Anonymous
If MicroStation is on Parasolids, maybe it's a step from NNA to be compatible with Bentley's BIM tools (to help take on the big beast?)

# re: Could VectorWorks Be Switching to Parasolid?

9/14/2008 7:32 AM by mcaad
As today is sunday, the meeting was on thursday, we didn't got to know if it was right, so it was just an overinterpretation ?!
I think it would make sense to get parasolid kernel. Revit is very much like ArchiCAD and Vectorworks but it was developed later and is much more focused on parametrics, variations, change-proofing and object-relations. In this way Revit seems at the moment more convincing as BIM-tool, from the PR-aspect at least.
Vectorworks actually contains already most of Revits tools since very long time, by recent updates the similarity became more obvious.
The things which are still missing (e.g. variations, change-proofing) might come with the parasolid kernel.
By the way the german distribution already contains much more parametric and architecual tools than the original us version, this might alos getting improoved with Vectorworks 2009. At least again a little bit.

# MRRCKb <a href="http://xrwiwaqhfdlr.com/">xrwiwaqhfdlr</a>, [url=http://yszqnxzyfoge.com/]yszqnxzyfoge[/url], [link=http://fjidjiaufrpx.com/]fjidjiaufrpx[/link], http://mcrvtamjynbs.com/

9/30/2008 1:18 AM by hoapeos
MRRCKb <a href="http://xrwiwaqhfdlr.com/">xrwiwaqhfdlr</a>, [url=http://yszqnxzyfoge.com/]yszqnxzyfoge[/url], [link=http://fjidjiaufrpx.com/]fjidjiaufrpx[/link], http://mcrvtamjynbs.com/

# re: Could VectorWorks Be Switching to Parasolid?

10/1/2008 8:05 PM by Jordan D. Cachola
it is verry impressivem... i learn a lot... tnx..

# re: Could VectorWorks Be Switching to Parasolid?

10/4/2008 1:59 PM by davids
Here's Nemetschek's own confirmation of the move to Parasolid, with rationale why.

http://download2.nemetschek.net/www_misc/2009/ParasolidAdvantages.pdf

# 156NE1 <a href="http://fifqjmyifwfb.com/">fifqjmyifwfb</a>, [url=http://ikexcdswyjgl.com/]ikexcdswyjgl[/url], [link=http://jireifzujwqa.com/]jireifzujwqa[/link], http://bcydejedrznl.com/

10/5/2008 3:13 PM by fvgcogzqwhf
156NE1 <a href="http://fifqjmyifwfb.com/">fifqjmyifwfb</a>, [url=http://ikexcdswyjgl.com/]ikexcdswyjgl[/url], [link=http://jireifzujwqa.com/]jireifzujwqa[/link], http://bcydejedrznl.com/
Comments on this post are closed